In the last few posts I’ve been arguing for a traditional understanding of Jesus’ impeccability. Yes his temptations were real, yes as a real human he had the capability to sin and yet due to the uniqueness of his person he was yet not capable of sinning. And I’m saying this is roughly the classical and orthodox position across the last two millennia. You can catch up here, here and here.
The view has been criticised as both incoherent and offering no comfort whatsoever. And yet this isn’t incoherent and I think it does offer comfort.